“Sierra. Hotel. India. Echo. Lima. Delta.”
The Shield was a phenomenal stable. I can’t think of a group that was so effective and compelling, from:
Even the breakup of the group drew substantial heat, not just because Rollins turned out to be a backstabbing heel, but because the moment that chair swung, the fans knew The Shield was over.
It’s like knowing you’re on the last episode of your favorite TV show.
But now, it seems the stable, much like a lot of television shows, may get another go.
Well, a lot’s changed. To the point where, as the lowly-hated-backstage indy booker I am, I don’t see the upside of including Roman Reigns in a new Shield.
Let me take you through my reasoning. And I’ll also give you an alternative plan to putting Roman in The Shield.
Post-Shield Ambrose and Rollins have maintained a very solid relationship with crowds.
Sure, both have suffered from poor creative positioning by WWE, but a better-than-average story has proven to revive the bigger responses they are able to get from fans.
Then, there’s post-Shield Roman.
While he was a solid addition to the stable – the hard-hitter who shuts everyone down, speaks only when he damn well pleases – his character has evolved in such a way that he no longer fits into the stable.
From a 80-90s-action-hero-type – which suited him perfectly – he was forcibly pushed and morphed into the all-service, often times generic WWE main event guy Vince McMahon seems to demand.
And, while he drips charisma…
This makes Roman a very different puzzle piece from the one that fit into The Shield. He’ll no longer be the killer we want to see sweep the opposition, after Rollins and/or Ambrose play the babyface in peril.
When Roman’s character changed, the crowd’s reaction changed as well. For two big reasons:
You’re doomed from the start and your best outcome is to become aware of it quickly. So you can try something else.
Unfortunately, Vince McMahon seems to be the kind of person who would probably try to outrun Usain Bolt. He’d probably say something like “I’ll do it too, as long as I don’t sneeze.”
And, just like Vince in running shoes is a bad fit for the Olympics, Roman has become a weird fit for The Shield II.
However, his character is only part of the issue. Here’s the other part of the problem:
In my experience, an important part of booking a storyline is predicting audience reaction.
For example, imagine a story where you have a veteran taking a newcomer under his wing and creating a new tag team. The team picks up steam with the fans.
Then, after a few months, the newcomer reveals he only gained the veteran’s confidence so he could learn his techniques and strategies… so he can be the one who retires him. WHAM!
If the veteran is a douche, you anticipate a babyface reaction for the new guy. If the veteran is well-loved, you anticipate a heel reaction.
(Please note that if the veteran isn’t get much of a reaction, heel or face, expect exactly that for the new guy’s turn.)
Now, if we were to trying and anticipate what would happen if Roman joins DFA and SFR, what do you envision? Let me know in the comments.
Here’s what my crystal ball says: I don’t see what alliance makes this version of Roman Reigns get a babyface reaction.
Picture this: WWE does a few in-ring teasers to the full Shield reunion. At the very least, I can imagine several sections of the crowd vocally opposing the return of Roman to the stable.
Ambrose, Rollins raise their fist for the bump in Roman’s direction. Am I the only one who hears boos from the crowd with this picture?
Roman is not going back to getting babyface pops because of re-aligning with Ambrose and Rollins.
If anything, Ambrose and Rollins will be in some jeopardy, as they’ll be at Roman’s side, as his partners-in-crime.
Why mix two things that will do nothing for one side (Roman) and probably damage the other (AmbRollins).
Note: I’m grazing by the possibility that this reunion may come against the Miztourage. If you can add and read, you should also understand the disparity between the two groups.
Booking Rule #41: Go with what you have.
If Roman isn’t going to be a crowd-pleasing babyface, don’t make him one. If people are way more open to boo him, that’s what you use.
Have Ambrose and Rollins save Roman from a 3-on-1 attack and have that dramatic pause where the reunion is foreshadowed. Re-run the Ambrose/Rollins story, with AmbRollins trying to convince Roman to reform the Hounds of Justice.
… he also BLOCKS Ambrose and Rollins from reforming The Shield. Why? Because he’s Roman Reigns, he was The Shield’s heaviest hitter and now, he’s The Big Dog.
Therefore, he talked to Vince, who agreed that “The Shield” can’t be used in any way unless Roman says it can.
Roman gets boos that are from a storyline, we get use the perception that he’s the corporate choice in said storyline and the feud can have some longevity, with:
Plan C would just be to make The Shield reunite as a heel faction. It’s a more natural fit, as it’s easier for Ambrose and Rollins to get booed than for Roman to get cheered. However, it seems like a bit of a waste, considering the goodwill the stable has with fans.
Should The Shield reunite? Should Roman be in it?